Sanor

One AI answer is a guess.
Multiple is a signal.

Ask one question. Watch multiple AI models debate. Get a clear answer with consensus, conflicts, and confidence.

sanor.app/c/newDetailed
Should I quit my job and start my own company?
GPT-5

Strong upside if there is validated demand.

waiting
Claude 3.5

High risk without financial runway.

waiting
Gemini 2.5

Validate first; quitting now is premature.

waiting
Grok 4

Speed matters less than survival.

waiting
DeepSeek

Define a traction milestone before leaving.

waiting
ConsensusMedium · 68%ConflictSpeed vs. risk reduction5 models · 4 turns

Synthesised answer

Validate demand first
Runway is non-negotiable
Speed depends on signals

The problem

One answer isn’t enough when the question matters.

Most AI tools give you a single response. But you never see what other models would challenge, confirm, or disagree with. When the decision matters, hidden uncertainty is the problem.

Single voice

You hear one model. The other four perspectives stay locked away.

Hidden uncertainty

No way to tell whether the answer is the consensus or an outlier.

No accountability

Nothing to compare against. Nothing to challenge.

The solution

Make AI think together.

Sanor lets multiple AI models analyse the same question, challenge assumptions, compare perspectives, and converge into one structured answer you can actually use.

QuestionGPT-5ClaudeGeminiGrokDeepSeekOne answer

Two engines

Two ways to make AI debate.

Pick the engine that matches the question. Cross-model when the answer needs to survive different perspectives. Multirole when one model is enough but the angles aren’t.

Multimodel · default

Five models. One question.

GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Grok and DeepSeek each analyse the same question independently, then debate, challenge and converge. Different training data, different blind spots — visible disagreement.

Best for — Best for high-stakes calls, contested questions, anywhere a single model could be confidently wrong.

Multirole · cost-efficient

One model. Many experts.

SkepticAdvocateDevil's advocateDomain expert

Pick a single base model and assign it expert roles — Skeptic, Advocate, Devil’s advocate, Domain expert. The same engine reasons from each role’s lens, then synthesises.

Best for — Best for structured analysis where you want consistent reasoning style across roles, faster and at a fraction of the credits.

Switch between engines at the top of every chat. Each mode (Fast / Detailed / Research) shows its credit cost upfront.

How it works

Three steps. One signal.

I

Ask once

Submit your question like you would in any AI chat.

II

They debate

Different models — or one model wearing different expert hats — analyse, challenge, and refine each other’s answers.

III

Get the signal

Receive the final answer, consensus level, conflicts, and confidence score.

A real example

Watch the signal emerge.

A real example

Q

Should I quit my job and start my own company?

Model I

Strong upside if there is validated demand.

Model II

High risk without financial runway.

Model III

Best path is validation before quitting.

Consensus

Medium · 68%

Conflict

Speed vs. risk reduction.

Final answer

Don’t quit immediately. Validate the idea, secure 6–12 months of runway, and define a clear traction milestone before leaving your job.

Features

Built for clearer thinking.

Multi-AI debate

See how different models approach the same question.

Consensus score

Understand where the models agree.

Conflict detection

Spot the assumptions and disagreements that matter.

Synthesised answer

Get one clean answer instead of reading five long replies.

Debate history

Review how the conclusion was reached.

Saved threads

Save important questions and revisit them later.

Use cases

Use it when the answer matters.

Startup decisions

Should I pivot, raise, or stay the course?

Research questions

Compile what is known. Surface what is contested.

Career choices

Stay, leave, found, join — with second-order effects.

Investment thinking

Stress-test a thesis against opposing perspectives.

Product strategy

Compare frameworks. Find where they disagree on yours.

Personal decisions

Move, marry, study, change — see all the angles.

Compared to

Not another AI chat.

Today

Typical AI

  • One answer
  • Hidden uncertainty
  • No model disagreement
  • You decide what to trust

With Sanor

Sanor

  • Multiple perspectives
  • Visible consensus
  • Clear conflicts
  • Synthesised final answer

Pricing

Start free. Go deeper when it matters.

Free

$0forever
  • Limited questions
  • Basic consensus
  • Standard answers
Get started
Most signal

Pro

$24per month
  • More questions
  • Deep debates
  • Full debate history
  • Saved threads
  • Advanced confidence insights
Try Pro free

Cancel any time. No card required to start.

Stop relying on one answer.

See the signal behind multiple AI perspectives.